Ahead of today’s NATO summit, Madeline Albright and 15 other former foreign ministers around the world wrote President Trump a letter urging him to work on improving America’s “deteriorating” relationships with allies, and warning him not to ignore the threat Russia poses. It’s safe to assume he didn’t bother reading it.
Instead, Trump again accused NATO members of not spending enough on defense, and saying Germany’s natural gas imports make Germany (a key U.S. ally) a “captive of Russia.” A reprisal of Trump’s “no puppet! you’re the puppet” attack on Hillary Clinton during the debates, but for destroying the alliance that has successfully prevented global thermonuclear war for decades.
This alarming behavior received resounding criticism from both Democratic leaders as well as Republicans, including Sen. Bob Corker (R-TN), who said "When I see [U.S.] leadership diminishing and trying to break apart alliances that we created, it troubles me." Oh Bob, you are always so troubled. And yet… you do… what do you do again?
Foreign policy analysts are perhaps more alarmed about this than any of Trump’s previous foreign adventures. They believe his behavior is designed to undermine the alliance and may even be calibrated to bring about it’s collapse sooner than later.
Dan Shapiro, the former U.S. ambassador to Israel, who served on President Obama’s National Security Council warned, “we could be on the on the cusp of a completely new era, a fundamental reshaping of the international order. And I don't mean over the course of the Trump Administration. I mean by next week.”
“If he sabotages the NATO summit the way he did the G-7,” Shapiro added, “don't be surprised if he actually makes a move toward exiting NATO.”
This dovetails with new reporting from the New Yorker’s Adam Entous, who discovered that Russia and the U.S. may be on the cusp of a grand bargain, even as Trump threatens to unravel the Western alliance. Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE—all countries that have courted Trump—have been encouraging him and Putin to reach an agreement that would require Putin to drive Iranian forces out of Syria and end the conflict there in exchange for the U.S. removing sanctions it imposed on Russia for invading Crimea.
Ukraine is not a NATO ally, but by striking such a deal, Trump would signal that he’d take a soft line on Russian incursions into neighboring countries, which would severely damage an alliance based on mutual defense against outside aggressors. Trump and Putin are scheduled to meet in Helsinki on July 16.
From Tommy: Remember World Wars I and II? Yeah, those were bad. One reason we've managed to keep the peace for the last 70 years is because of the NATO alliance. When Trump attacks NATO or unfairly criticizes our allies, he makes it harder to guarantee the freedom and security of its members, including our own.