Trump’s Interior Department is spending $139,000 to upgrade doors in Secretary Ryan Zinke’s office—a revelation that comes right on the heels of Ben Carson’s $31,000 dining set at HUD. From Dan Pfeiffer: “This is the sort of corruption that enrages voters and flips the House and Senate, but it requires aggressive, sustained and creative paid and earned messaging.”
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) and 21 other GOP senators are reintroducing a measure that will allow opponents of same-sex marriage to ignore federal anti-discrimination rules. According to First amendment litigator Greg Lipper, this “First Amendment Defense Act” violates the trifecta of the Free Speech Clause, the Establishment Clause, and the Equal Protection Clause. If Republicans in Washington were nicer to gay people, maybe they’d have fewer interior decorating scandals.
Veterans Affairs Secretary David Shulkin is overhauling leadership at the VA after a new investigation revealed “failed leadership” put patients at risk. Apparently, that “failed leadership” doesn’t include him using taxpayer funds to take a trip to Europe with his wife, and then having his chief of staff forge documents to justify the expense.
The White House is considering filling Gary Cohn’s vacant position with Andy Puzder, who was forced to withdraw from consideration to be the Trump administration’s labor secretary after his ex-wife’s abuse allegations resurfaced. In most White Houses this would be disqualifying, but in Trump’s, it gets you a provisional security clearance (hi, Rob Porter).
Trump’s former Deputy National Security Adviser Dina Powell returned to Goldman Sachs, and apparently Goldman employees aren’t thrilled. Neither is Jon Lovett, who wrote an open letter to Dina. Keep a spot in that Goldman revolving door warm for Gary Cohn too.
Sam Nunberg now plans to fully comply with Special Counsel Mueller, saying it wasn’t that hard to find his emails after all. Mueller witnesses—they’re just like us!
A judge is recommending that Trump mute Twitter followers, instead of blocking them, to avoid a First Amendment lawsuit. Her analysis appears to derive from the Constitution’s RTs ≠ endorsements clause.